CSOs demand accountability, lament tokenistic CSO space in the FfD regional dialogue

   
The CSO delegation in the First High-Level Follow-up Dialogue, composed of nine CSO representatives from Asia and the Pacific

The CSO delegation in the First High-Level Follow-up Dialogue, composed of nine CSO representatives from Asia and the Pacific

 

The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN ESCAP) held the First High-Level Follow-up Dialogue on Financing for Development in Asia Pacific on March 30-31, 2016 in Incheon, South Korea. More than a hundred participants attended the event, including nine (9) representatives from civil society organizations.

The event was organized to provide different development actors a venue to review the Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA) commitments and discuss strategies for their implementation. The High-Level Follow-up focused on six key issues: regional tax cooperation, capital markets, institutional investors, financial inclusion, climate finance, and South-South cooperation and triangular development cooperation.

Space for civil society participation was tokenistic at best, with CSO delegates limited to short interventions, and not provided speaking slots in the panel sessions. The dialogue highlighted technical aspects of taxation/gathering revenue from various sectors, trade, technology use, reducing illicit financial flows, and development cooperation but most panelists did not discuss how these affect the grassroots communities, especially the vulnerable and marginalized sectors.

CSO delegates brought into the table the issue of shrinking space for civil society organizations due to restrictive laws implemented by various governments in the region, making it a struggle for many CSOs to exercise their right as development actors. Another issue is how several large-scale infrastructure projects have adversely affected grassroots communities. Military instruments have been utilized in land grabs, forced evictions, and other human rights violations. Some projects also have caused severe and irreparable damage to the environment. The most vulnerable to these are the marginalized sectors: the women, children, indigenous peoples/cultural minorities, farmers and fisherfolk, the urban poor, among others.

The panel speakers for Session 6 discussed about country experiences in South-South and triangular development cooperation

The panel speakers for Session 6 discussed about country experiences in South-South and triangular development cooperation

The Reality of Aid (RoA) pointed out that although South-South cooperation is premised on solidarity among Southern countries, SSC should still be subject to close scrutiny through the lens of SSC principles (non-conditionality, respect for national sovereignty, mutual benefit, among others), including rights-based approaches, to prevent these from evolving into new forms of inequality and underdevelopment. Queenie Diane Malabanan of RoA stated that “the demand of developing countries to untie foreign aid applies to both Northern and Southern donors… the recipient country must be given leeway in applying its own procurement systems and standards to South-South and triangular cooperation projects based on its own priorities and needs.”

In the issue of regional tax cooperation, CSOs emphasized the need for transparency and allocation for services for the people. “The Proposal [of Asia-Pacific Tax Forum] should create a notion that raising of revenues should be accompanied by transparent and participatory budget processes; on the other hand the spending policy should aim for poverty reduction, environmental sustainability and ensure provisions for social services and social protection,” said Titi Soentoro of Aksi! for Gender, Social and Ecological Justice – Indonesia.

In response to these issues, CSOs call on the substantial inclusion of CSOs and local communities in the decision-making, implementation, assessment & monitoring phases of infrastructure projects to make sure that people’s voices will be heard. Social and environmental safeguards to protect the environment and communities affected by development projects should be put in place. CSOs stressed the importance of country and democratic ownership, mutual accountability and transparency, and CSO engagement in development cooperation.

The CSO delegates also called for the inclusion of CSOs in future follow-up dialogues and to secure their space to share experiences and recommendations in the area of financing for development.#